This is a topographical snapshot through which I pass on a regular basis and one which demonstrates the complex entanglement of emotions, memories, perceptions and debate that landscape engenders. In discussing the relationship between landscape and Englishness David Matless asserts that "if landscape carries an unseemly spatiality, it also shuttles through temporal processes of history and memory. Judgements over present value work in relation to narratives of past landscape".
The first image, a postcard photograph taken in the early twentieth century (from the Tempus Images of England: Stapleton volume) has all the elements required to conjure up feelings of wistful nostalgia for times past: the sunny black and whiteness, a ford gently sloping to a rocky river, the luxuriant trees and distant cottage. The setting populated by a group of children, a horse and a charabanc. All harmonious and timeless, everything in its right place. Never mind that such scenes were often stage-managed or that the juggernaut of suburbanisation was rapidly approaching, this is how we want Old England to be represented in our imagination; and sits well with a popular strain of elegiac gloom, tapped into by Philip Larkin in his poem Going, Going:
"And that will be England gone,
The shadows, the meadows, the lanes,
The guildhalls, the carved choirs.
There'll be books; it will linger on
In galleries; but all that remains
For us will be concrete and tyres."
The second image, taken last summer and on my cycle route from home to work, is an equally interesting view of the same spot. But all is now changed, the only constant in the century or so between the photographs is the river Frome. The handsome arched stone bridge replaced by the straight-line utilitarianism of its 1930's successor - no doubt seen as shiny and modern at the time, but now drab and anonymous - and the ford no more. Most dramatically, the flyover carrying the M32 motorway into the heart of the city stomps over the ground-level topography like an unstoppable and disregarding lava flow of concrete; physically connected to its surroundings by its supporting pillars, but wholly dismissive of the reluctantly subterranean world cowering beneath. The bare, infertile earth in the foreground emphasising the malignant impact of this early 1970's addition; part of a wider contemporary malaise that Keith Brace articulates in his 1971 Portrait of Bristol: "I believe that Bristol is at a point of crisis in its history and that the modest-sized, relaxed, intimate city we have known is all too likely to become a disproportionately large provisional metropolis, resembling all other provisional metropolises of the future in clinical impersonality".
Undeniably this kind of motor-city infrastructure, conceived on a drawing-board - the product of a late twentieth-century narrowly focused technocratic imagination - unsettles the balance of the existing landscape through which it courses. The benefits that it provides - harder, faster, stronger communications links between city and hinterland - are disputable and, in any case, locally irrelevant compared to what it takes away not only in terms of pollution but also aesthetically and spiritually.
But linger and look, and all is not lost. Move under the flyover and, on the right day, a sunlit vista of the neighbouring Bridge Farm opens up, framed by greenery. This eighteenth century agricultural relic (seen opposite and in the old photograph below, also taken from Images of England: Stapleton) occupies a visually stimulating juxtaposition with the modernity of the airborne motorway just metres away. A pleasing reminder that this area plays fast and loose with simplistic notions of zonal separation between urban, suburban and rural: all three rub together here. And we can begin to chip away at the, in Matthew Johnson's words, "unrestrained empiricism" of the Romantic view of landscape as a purely visual and aesthetic phenomena.
Looking in the opposite direction there is a certain grace to the curving slip road, descending along the edge of the defiant greenery of Eastville Park; a pleasing contrast of light and shade. The paved non-space below the road has become here an arena for a variety of unofficial activities: unseen daily depositors of vast amounts of bread crumbs for pigeons, a troupe engaged in fire-eating training and, most impressively, guerrilla artists decorating two of the concrete supports with bright and vibrant scenes of nature. Humanity is re-colonising this desolate void.
So, far from being, as it may first appear, merely a scene of brutalist alienation - an elegy for a lost land, the contemporary landscape has character and interest aplenty; a mixture of historic features, re-imagined and reused, and what Nan Fairbrother describes as the "self-contained linear landscape" of the motorway. Stepping back into the picture post card Edwardian scenes there is much that we are not told when viewing this reassuring scene, as seemingly wholesome as a period drama, that may similarly alter the initial perception.The bridge was on the edge of eighteenth century Kingswood Chase, a remnant of the much larger Royal Forest of Kingswood that covered 200 square miles until disafforestation in 1228. By the eighteenth century, and continuing into the nineteenth, Kingswood was viewed as a hot-bed of criminality, non-conformity, popular protest and general unruliness, with a rapidly growing population of colliers, quarrymen and other squatter-inhabitants. John Wesley sums up the areas reputation succinctly: "Few persons have lived long in the West of England who have not heard of the colliers of Kingswood: a people famous from the beginning hitherto, for neither fearing God nor regarding man". By the time of the black and white photographs shown here much of Kingswood and the areas surrounding Stapleton had become heavily populated and industrialised and Eastville Park, bounded by the bridge, had been established as a municipal green lung for the urban population. As it has largely remained, the area was already an oasis of residual or revenant rurality, surrounded by 'Ouses, Ouses, Ouses'. The chimera of old world stability and orderliness is further undermined by a decidedly non-photogenic landmark a mile down the road. At the opposite end of the village stood (and still stands) a huge Victorian complex that had seen time as a prison for 5,000 French soldiers during the Napoleonic wars, a lunatic asylum and workhouse for the poor.
Cycling home over the bridge and under the flyover I feel the full force of these diverse and conflicting temporal and spatial energies; a flash mob of liminal stimuli skulking in the shadows. Landscape as multi-sensory immersion. I sigh heavily at the imagined memory of the old house, 'Sunnybanks', (though I have never seen it) that used to stand on the higher ground above the bridge and was demolished to make way for the motorway embankment. But I also can't help finding the fleeting phenomenological experience of under-passing the concrete monolith exhilarating; sound-tracked by the disembodied harsh monotone of the traffic above, like a minimalist symphony of repetitive drones. And the prospect of the last mile home along the still green banks of the Frome, with the potential for sightings of heron, kingfisher or barn owl, spurs on my tired limbs and lifts the landscapist spirit further.
References
Avon Archaeological Council and Avon Local History Association, 1982 Avon Past 7 Pamphlet.
Baker, Kenneth (Ed.), 2000 The Faber Book of Landscape Poetry London: Faber and Faber.
Bartlett, John, 2004 Images of England: Fishponds Stroud: Tempus.
Brace, Keith, 1971 Images of Bristol London: Robert Hale.
Fairbrother, Nan, 1972 New Lives, New Landscapes London: Penguin.
Johnson, Matthew, 2007 Ideas of Landscape Oxford: Blackwell.
Matless, David, 1998 Landscape and Englishness London: Reaktion.
Smith, Veronica, 2004 Images of England: Stapleton Stroud: Tempus.
Wylie, John, 2007 Landscape Oxford: Routledge.
Excellent post Eddie. Very interesting
ReplyDeleteYes, a great example of how the landscape is not a permanent presence, but one that shifts in timescales mostly beyond our brief lives. I love the image of 'sunnybanks' - the perfect metaphor for the lost english landscape; the georgian-era idyll demolished to make way for a flyover. You couldn't make it up.....
ReplyDeleteThanks again, Eddie
Ian
Lovely piece. What worries me about this approach, however, is how it's devoid of any reference to ecology, the stark difference between concrete and earth, and what this both signifies and symbolises. Yes - it is possible to see beauty in the lines of concrete but plants don't see it, nor birds, insects, or animals. Concrete is essentially dead - it doesn't have the magnetism, life, call it what you will, that we find on a walk in the countryside. So while I don't disagree with this stuff per se, I do think it's a dangerous eulogy which planners, capitalists and developers use to justify their assault on the land.
ReplyDeleteThanks for your comments James. I am certainly no apologist for unrestrained concreting over of landscapes and ecosystems, and brutalist architecture and over-developed transport and distribution infrastructures are really not my thing; I'm totally with you on that. What I was trying to get at here was to look beyond the binary 'proper countryside/ halcyon days' good, everything else bad approach. Landscape and the historical events that shape it are a more complex, and interesting, beast than that.
ReplyDeleteYes I didn't think that was your position Eddie. And I too enjoy the "psychogeography" of re-imagining spaces where there is some fragmentary beauty amongst the concrete: as you say, the birds you can still see etc.
ReplyDeleteBut there is some rhetoric which is devoid of ecological awareness, suggesting concrete lines are no more or less beautiful than field and trees; that all of it is just an idea one way or the other. Which is nonsense - for ecological reasons, and also aesthetic reasons, and how the two relate.
.
DeleteGreat to discuss with you James. Like you, I am one for the hills and wild places, near and far. I do not hold with relativism, that all landscapes (and ecologies) are of equal value. The accelerated development, technology and capitalist free-booting of the last 200 years have wrought terrible damage to the planet and humanity itself.
Some landscapes though, maybe damaged or degraded in ecological terms, in juxtaposing features and topographies from different era's hold a fascination to anyone with an interest in place. I would agree though that without an aesthetic and ecological context such interest is pretty hollow.
Fascinating post, especially for those of us with Bristol connections. I've been a resident in/visitor to the city on and off since 1987 and I'm teaching a couple of my A level students about the cultural geography of Bristol. In the late eighties I spent several months driving a parcel delivery van around the city and got to know its secret places very well. Back then St Paul's was considered a 'dodgy' place to explore after midnight but I can remember many happy nights in its pubs and clubs. Hartcliffe, on the other hand, really was a 'no-go' area.
ReplyDeleteI can understand the aesthetic of the motorway landscape but whenever I'm in the vicinity of the M32 I can't help thinking it has had a tremendously negative impact on the inner-city landscape. As the demographic of the inner-city changes it seems to me that 'gentrification' (and I think that in Bristol the 'gentrification' process is different to that of London but that's another discussion) is pushing Bristol migrant/ethnic communities eastwards and I can't help thinking that the M32 at Eastville, along with the shopping complex on the old Rovers' ground, might become some sort of post-political 'Berlin Wall'.
Thanks Sian. So called dodgy areas of Easton, Stokes Croft, St Paul's definitely best places for a night out. I agree with your comments about the M32 dividing up the inner city - there was clearly little thought to this impact at the time. In a strange way the motorway has a more benign impact as it cuts through the green space on the way to this built up area.
DeleteThis shows a great picture of landscapes but let us help you gardening your home with
ReplyDeletelandscaping beverly ma